Caligula 1979 movie review. Review: Caligula (1979) « Widerscreenings Ebooks 2019-02-22

Caligula 1979 movie review Rating: 5,6/10 638 reviews

Film of the Day: 24 January

caligula 1979 movie review

What do you call it when auteurs make a film that delights in graphic sexualized violence against men? Regular cuts included a scene where a drunken soldier is force-fed wine through a funnel, and then spectacularly disembowelled, and a bit where a severed penis is thrown out as dog food after a torture murder. It is inherently easy to just play a man on the brink of insanity, but McDowell's Caligula is played more like an anarchist, challenging every norm in the governing of Rome and rightfully instilling fear within his inner circle. You bet your bippy it is! The movie depicts the awkward characters of the mad king like killing the one who opposes him, sexual abuse of her sister and many other things. Caligula came to power following the death of his grandfather, Emperor Tiberius Peter O'Toole , murdered jointly by Caligula and his trusted ally, the Praetorian Prefect, Macro Guido Mannari. The 18 certificate version of this film runs 102 minutes, the full unexpurgated version runs 156 minutes, there's hardly a scene that goes by without some piece of sleaze or gore on screen.

Next

Film of the Day: 24 January

caligula 1979 movie review

The movie depicts Claudius played by Giancarlo Badessi as a complete moron, which is untrue. The content and images used on this site are copyright protected and copyrights vests with the respective owners. What I'm telling you now. Both O'Toole's and Gielgud's characters only lasted through the first half hour of the film, but their mere presence alone brought some semblance of sanity to the utter lunacy that is Caligula. What exactly did they film though? All in all, the film had a good cast, and when filming began, it seemed like they had enough to make a good movie. And this is just the saner side of things.

Next

Review: Caligula (1979) « Widerscreenings Ebooks

caligula 1979 movie review

What was supposed to be a docudrama of shocking and sickening historical truth, about the horrible intersection of personal lust and political power, instead becomes a cornucopia of kitsch. What a mess this was! Quiet moments serve as preludes to acts of madness, with tone of voice an indicator of the descent into sadistic psychosis. He was a contradictory ruler — he built many roads, aqueducts, temples and huge ships and seemed to love audacious civil engineering projects. Once his money was in the film, Guccione had final say on everything. If you do not accept terms mentioned in the , you must not share any of your personal information and immediately exit Bookmyshow. There is plenty of gratuitous sex and violence to satisfy the grindhouse fans, and a little bit of class brought by some of the top-billed actors of the time to even things out. To top it all off, in the midst of such insolence and decadence on screen, we have award-winning actors like Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O'Toole and John Gielgud plying their ware alongside Guccione's harem of sexy Penthouse Pets.

Next

Have you seen “Caligula” (1979 film)? Roger Ebert gave it 0 stars. Is it that bad?

caligula 1979 movie review

Till this day, the controversial 1979 film, remains an anomaly among major motion pictures. Instead, it ended up being the film that was probably responsible for the closing of the small doorway that had been briefly open, in the seventies, between porn and mainstream cinema, despite the fact that in purely financial terms, it was successful. Well, for certain, it is the one of the most obscene movies that I have ever seen and I would not consider myself to be a prude. The sets are as grand as they are bizarre, the directing and cinematography are well executed, and even though it is over 2 ½ hours long, it certainly moves forward at a good pace. Disgusted and unspeakably depressed, I walked out of the film after two hours of its 170-minute length. Set design is truly lavish, ornate and exquisitely rendered.

Next

Caligula (Four

caligula 1979 movie review

He also sleeps with his sister, organises elaborate orgies and embarks on a fruitless invasion of England before meeting an appropriate end. Is it a period drama? The sound transfer is a fully re-mastered Dolby Digital 5. The story of Caligula — what we know of it — is a powerful one, and had been made into successful drama before. The facts get shaky when we realize that there is not much actual or unbiased historical information written on the man. His first decision was to pick Tinto Brass as director. Caligula is a very, very bad movie.

Next

Film of the Day: 24 January

caligula 1979 movie review

When you start with a title like Santa Claus Conquers The Martians, or have Tom Green write a screenplay, you know right up front that your chances of ending up with a good movie are zero. The movie features some great sets and is so over-the-top in all aspects. The film was released unrated and despite poor reviews has become a cult classic over the years. This brief legitimization of the American porno film as a distinct genre also coincided with a move in Italian cinema of the period towards depictions of often sadistic excess, with Salo and Salon Kitty garnering much controversy. And this is where things started to go wrong: Brass became the fulcrum of most of the conflicts that followed.

Next

Caligula

caligula 1979 movie review

There are scenes of decapitation, evisceration, rape, bestiality, sadomasochism, necrophilia. Unlike A Clockwork Orange, a lot of Caligula is not redeemed by plot or story. Eventually, the government has had enough and no real spoiler here takes care of things in a very brutal way. The character is brash and loud and maybe the only redeeming factor of the movie. When Vidal saw what the project was turning into, he insisted that his name be removed from the credits.


Next

Have you seen “Caligula” (1979 film)? Roger Ebert gave it 0 stars. Is it that bad?

caligula 1979 movie review

Meanwhile, shooting was hardly underway before Brass and Vidal got into conflict. The problem is that whilst Guccione seems in praise of such sexual immorality, Brass sees it as a symptom of a decaying humanity and of the corrupt language of power. In 1979, Bob Guccione and Penthouse magazine sprang what was, at the time, the first multimillion dollar home porno movie upon an unsuspecting world. Caligula arrived as ruler of Rome by a tortuous, intrigue-filled and bloody route and worked hard once in power to increase the autocratic power of the emperor. Apparently Guccione even operated a camera himself, despite having no experience. But it all went tits up, so to speak.

Next

Caligula Movie (1979)

caligula 1979 movie review

And it made Guccione so much money he was able to build a casino. Is this a gory film? Very explicit material was filmed in a non-erotic way, but in the final cut, the great majority of the hardcore content is entirely conventional pornography. If toned down by about 5000%, this would have made an average Roman film, but considering that out of the 156 minute running time, I would say that only 30 minutes would constitute an actual story and out of that, only about 10 minutes was remotely historical accurate, the technical successes of the film were squandered on what is essentially a depraved, censorship challenging porno, more interested in making headlines than telling a real story, sex or no sex. Although I have taken the form of Gaius Caligula, I am all men as I am no man and so…I am a god. So this is not for the regular dirty mackintosh brigade.

Next